Before my eyes:
       "Machinal" by Sophie Treadwell
       "Tales of the City" by Armistead Maupin


       In my ears:
       "Million Miles from Home" - Keziah Jones
       "Eye to the Telescope" - KT Tunstall

Monday, May 30, 2005

Strange things you remember when you're drunk...

Moments are lost, forever. Opportunities spark into being, flicker for all of the time it takes to lose your nerve, implode into a smokey trail... and then emptiness.

Friday night, I drank a couple of litres of a belgian beer that found its way to the back of my skull and began hammering at the walls of my mind. I was wasted within two hours of sitting down on the cafe bench and it was only 8.30pm when I rose uncertainly to march back to Waterloo and take the train back to SW15. Throbbing, rolling about on a train seat, I fought the impulse of collapse...

In my stupor, I tried to think of interesting things, perhaps to stimulate a revival of my brain. My mind appealed to memory to save it from pulverisation...

1989, 1990, 1991...

My favourite tv programme was Northern Exposure
My favourite song was "There She Goes" by The La's
My best friend was a guy called Tim (with whom I have now lost contact)
I'm mad about a girl called Jo (she likes a guy called Leon, who I dislike)

Wednesday, May 18, 2005

Possession of my hands

Ah yes, sculpture.

Firstly, a bit of background. My interest in sculpture is longstanding, but it's a highly interior interest - I don't sit and talk to people at length about how much I love Rodin or Degas, I just spend time thinking back to experiences in the presence of the object. I guess the first image in my mind of a sculpture can be dated to 1985, when I was first introduced to Classics. On the frontispiece of my first book on classical mythology was a picture of the famous statue of Laocöon, flanked by his faltering sons as his contorted torso is being consumed by serpents. The image of the dying man made an impact (as would other statues of bodies in collapse, e.g. The Dying Gladiator), and twenty years later I would be close to tears as I stood face-to-face with the statue itself, in the Vatican collections - the culmination of an early longing to put myself in the presence of the iconic figures.

That trip to Rome a couple of years ago turned out to be a pilgrimage of sorts, although the decision was a snap one taken at the end of a particularly arduous 9 months of unhappy work in Belfast. What better way to revive spirits than a visit to the place where Bernini accomplished his great feats of genius? It was one of the best trips I have ever made, anywhere. The wealth of beauty was almost overwhelming. I spent hours in Travestere, paying homage to the great works I had only read about before: Bernini's ecstasy of Beata Ludovica Albertoni at San Francesco a'Ripa, Maderno's rendering of the martyred Saint Cecilia at the Santa Cecilia in Travastere, to name but two of the most moving. In the Galeria Borghese were further delights by Bernini, the Rape of Persephone and Apollo and Daphne in particular. The latter a truly miraclulous vision, unquestionably genius, human talent of freakish brilliance that may never be surpassed, ever.

If this last paragraph reads like a rushed travel guide, you have to forgive. Viewing these pieces felt, at each opportunity, like an act of collection. It is, therefore, difficult not to lapse into account when returning in the mind to those miracles of stone. Sculptural composition inspired by great stories, by mythology and scripture, creates an effect of emotional power that is perhaps the essence of what constitutes the artistic (well, in my opinion anyway). The physical exertion of rendering in three stubborn dimensions, the mental drain of concentration on acquiring perfection... and everything geared to an extraction of the totality of a human experience, wrapped in a single positional capture. It forces a binding commitment to the inspirational resource - the legend, the creed, the scriptural poetics etc.

I wrote an entry many months ago about my interpretation of the story of Pygmalion, but it is my favourite of all the classical myths. In Ovid's version, the sculptor's fingers are described as being "possessed" as he fashions the model of his aspirations to beauty and ultimately love. The use of this idea of possession, such that a third person is drawn into the creative process (it is no longer just the artist and his object, but the also external, supernatural dynamic - God? Nature?), is captivating because it undermines ownership or comprehension of the sculpted object. The sculptors, so deliberate and full of care in their movements, are nonetheless left baffled (philosophically, emotionally) at the result.

My practical incursions into the world of sculture began last week, at an introductory class. An excellent experience, even at this current, basic level. We are modelling in clay and creating casts in plaster. My first clay relief was of a whale motif - I like whale shapes, the similarity of the whale's body and its fins in particular. It was not very successful, vaguely interesting in composition and unimaginative in execution, but I think I can do better!

There are no delusions here - I am immediately aware that I am certainly bereft of talent. If I am lucky, however, I may at least manage something reaching competence in this pursuit. I intend steadily to take the specialised classes over the next few terms, to acquaint myself at least with the theory of the techniques if not the prowess that ought to accompany it. Perhaps more importantly, I'm loving the sense of absorption that overtakes me when I am isolated with the clay and possibility. However poor the result, in the early moment when the clay is lumpen and unfulfilled, my heart rises momentarily to the pregnancy of the dumb material - the possibility that I might make it something more than its baseness. In my late lethargy, and in the absence of love, sculpture class may just ignite some sustainable passion.

Monday, May 16, 2005

Stasis Freak

Where to begin? Confusion in my work, frustration in my personal life, guilt in just about every missed commitment to anyone who means anything to me; in recent days, it has all been a cloud.

Nothing seems any clearer, from day to day, and in this state of unknowing I have succumbed to a vague emotional, intellectual and motivational paralysis. If not complete paralysis, then at least a slowing, deduction of motion.

In the blogs I read, in the pictures that are advertised as I walk through London, and in the faces of the commuters on the tube, it seems as though I'm moving in countertime as the world of "other people" casts myriad cinematic lives across the screen of the daily grind.

Even in things that should ignite a response, I have struggled to mount an emotive stance. All I can manage is a calm stare.

Example: I got offered piece of short contract work, at a rate of €800/day, doing telecoms work which I turned down - it wasn't the kind of work I wanted to do, stuff I'd be bored doing and that I know I couldn't personally justify the rate for. Some people can happily take vast sums for work they put little heart into, but I am not one of them (for better or worse).

The money didn't excite me. The thrill of even being approached didn't mark on my barometer of interest. I felt impassive, rational.

This weekend, I went down to Bristol to see my sister and brother-in-law, and spent Saturday being towed along as they made their last baby purchases (pram, cot, basket, steriliser). Being surrounded by so many new-parents-to-be was strangely relieving. It made me feel young, just at the point where I have been foolishly fretting about turning 29 at the end of the year.

On a less numbing curve, my first nephew/niece is due to arrive next month and even as I battle with the apathy of the wider implications of an undistinguished life story so far, inside a genuine excitement wells in anticipation of this new addition. Moreover, I'm totally impressed at my sister's discipline in refusing to learn or divulge the gender of the child, so as to prolong the surprise. Then again, maybe it's not so surprising. She always could leave the presents untampered at Christmas...

Finally, I think I should say thanks to whoever still reads my verbal debris - I'll try to muster something more interesting soon. Please be happy - happiness radiates over many miles, and I may pick up some of those waves if I'm lucky.

Sunday, May 08, 2005

Talent over competence

Last night was spent considering the disappointment of my twenties. I'm turning twenty-nine later this year, I'm feeling completely underwhelmed by my meagre achievements and manifold shortcomings in what I've embarked upon. This is not intended to be a weary, negative litany on the dampening of youth. I'm hoping, through the practice of reflection, to extract the defining lesson of the past decade - and I'm hoping I get there before I hit thirty so I can take the learning and de better! At the moment, the question is one of talent. I used to believe that I had some, not a huge amount, but enough to develop. What I am beginning to realise is that what I have is not talent, but competence. The difference between the two? Talent is essential, in that it can be conceptualised into an indivisible abstract. Competence, on the other hand, is simply a mechanical ability to do other things - a universal cog. Competence is machinal, the crank and handle. Talent is the phenomenon that enables the machine to animate. Ok, so this analogy is a rough one, but it serves to make a point. I work best as a conduit for talent: I am an artisan, but not talented in myself. I'm not sure if this makes me less worthy or not (I hope not!), but it's worth the self-examination...

My first sculpture class in on Tuesday - something to look forward to, something far removed from the drudgery of day-to-day employment. It's also an opportunity for me to observe the class and see how talent and competence interact, as I'm pretty sure the other members of class will demonstrate varying examples of both.

Friday, May 06, 2005

everywhere in chains

I love reading Rousseau's opening paradox in the Social Contract: "man is born free, yet everywhere he is in chains". Rousseau comes out with some crazy shit for much of his writing, but each time I read those words I am never less than stunned by the simple insight of the observation.

Familiarity abounds - the same place, the same people, the same names of the same days, the same look of incredulity on everyone's face. Yet, all at once, the world feels remote and alien.

After the election this week, I woke dazed and late on Friday. Having made preparations for the hangover by arranging to "work from home", I sat in my PJ's for the remaining hour of the morning, coffee in hand, digesting the BBC newsfeed. The result felt incidental - it was no less than I had predicted (albeit I had prophesied an 80-seat majority) - it was the sensation of the morning after that lay on me. I had the feeling that something important had happened, and yet everything also felt the same - and it would continue to feel so...
Google